What the Church
has to Learn from Alcoholics Anonymous
by Sam Shoemaker
Alcoholics Anonymous was founded
in 1935 by two struggling alcoholics
who needed a spiritual program to
attain and sustain ongoing recovery.
Out of the efforts of Bill W and Dr
Bob, the program known as Alcoholics
Anonymous was developed based on
living a lifestyle of twelve steps.
The principles of A.A.'s twelve steps
were a direct outgrowth of the Oxford
Group, based at Calvary Episcopal
Church in New York NY. The Reverend
Samuel M. Shoemaker, Rector of
Calvary Church and spiritual leader
of the Oxford Group, provided the
early inspiration for the spiritual
aspects of twelve-step programs.
The following is from a speech
given by Rev. Shoemaker at the
twentieth anniversary convention of
A.A. in St. Louis, Missouri. In this
timeless address, Rev. Shoemaker
reflects on four points that the
Church must always remember in
helping members to live into their
own personal Christian experience.
God chose what is foolish in the
world to shame the wise.
God chose what is weak in the world
to shame the strong... I
Corinthians 1:26During the weekend
of the Fourth of July last, I attended
one of the most remarkable conventions
I ever expect to attend. It was a
gathering in St. Louis of about five
thousand members of the movement
called Alcoholics Anonymous. The
occasion was the celebration of their
twentieth anniversary, and the turning
over freely and voluntarily of the
management and destiny of that great
movement by the founders and "old
timers" to a board which
represents the fellowship as a whole. As
I lived and moved among these men and
women for three days, I was moved as I
have seldom been moved in my life. It
happens that I have watched the
unfolding of this movement with more
than usual interest, for its real
founder and guiding spirit, Bill-,
found his initial spiritual answer at
Calvary Church in New York, when I was
rector there, in 1935. Having met two
men unmistakable alcoholics, who had
found release from their difficulty,
he was moved to seek out the same
answer for himself. But he went
further. Being of a foraging and
inquiring mind, he began to think
there was some general law operating
here, which could be made to work, not
in two men's lives only, but in two
thousand or two million. He set to
work to find out what it was. He
consulted psychiatrists, doctors,
clergy, and recovered alcoholics to
discover what it was.
The First Alcoholics Anonymous
Group
The first actual group was not in New
York, but in Akron, Ohio. Bill was
spending a weekend there in a hotel.
The crowd was moving towards the bar.
He was lonely and felt danger
assailing him. He consulted the church
directory in the hotel lobby, and
found the name of a local clergyman
and his church. He called him on the
telephone and said, "I am an
alcoholic down here at the hotel. The
going is a little hard just now. Have
you anybody you think I might meet and
talk to?" He gave him the name of
a woman who belonged to one of the
great tire manufacturing families. He
called her, she invited him out at
once and said she had a man she wanted
to have meet him while he was on his
way, she called Dr. Bob S- and his
wife, Anne. Dr. Bob said he'd give her
five minutes. He stayed five hours and
told Bill, "You're the only man
I've ever seen with the answer to
alcoholism." They invited Bill
over from the hotel to stay at their
house. And there was begun, twenty
years ago, the first actual Alcoholics
Anonymous group.The number of them
now is beyond count. Some say there
are 160,000 to 200,000 recovered
alcoholics, but nobody knows how many
extend beyond this into the fringes of
the unknown. They say that each
alcoholic holds within the orbit of
his problem an average of fourteen
persons who are affected by it. This
means that conservatively two and a
half million people's lives are
different because of the existence of
Alcoholics Anonymous. There is hardly
a city or town or even hamlet now
where you cannot find a group, strong
and well-knit, or struggling in its
infancy. Prof. Austin McCormick, of
Berkeley, California, former
Commissioner of Correction in the city
of New York, who was also with us at
the St. Louis Convention said once in
my hearing that AA may "prove to
be one of the greatest movements of
all time." That was years ago.
Subsequent facts support his prophecy. On
the Sunday morning of the convention,
I was asked to talk to them, together
with Fr. Edward Dowling S.J., a
wonderful Roman Catholic priest who
has done notable service for AA in
interpreting it to his people, and Dr.
Jim S., a most remarkable colored
physician of Washington, on the
spiritual aspects of the AA program.
They are very generous to
non-alcoholics, but I should have
preferred that it be a bona fide
alcoholic that did the speaking. In
the course of what I said to them, I
remarked that I thought it had been
wise for AA to confine its activity to
alcoholics. But, I added, "I
think we may see an effect of AA on
medicine, on psychiatry, on
correction, on the ever-present
problem of human nature; and not least
on the Church. AA indirectly derived
much of its inspiration from the
Church. Now perhaps the time has come
for the church to be re-awakened and
re-vitalized by those insights and
practices found in AA."
The Church ... Re-awakened and
Re-vitalized
I think some of you may be a little
horrified at this suggestion. I fear
you will be saying to yourself,
"What have we, who have always
been decent people, to learn from a
lot of reconstructed drunks?" And
perhaps you may thereby reveal to
yourself how very far you are from the
spirit of Christ and the Gospel, and
how very much in need of precisely the
kind of check-up that may come to us
from AA.If I need a text for what I
say to you, there is one ready to hand
in I Corinthians 1:26, "... God
chose what is foolish in the world to
shame the wise. God chose what is weak
in the world to shame the
strong." I need not remind you
that there is a good deal of sarcasm
in that verse; because it must be
evident that anything God can use is
neither foolish nor weak, and that if
we consider ourselves wise and strong,
we may need to go to school to those
we have called foolish and weak.
1. Recognition of Need
The first thing I think the Church
needs to learn from AA is that nobody
gets anywhere till he recognizes a
clearly-defined need. These people do
not come to AA to get made a little
better. They do not come because the
best people are doing it. They come
because they are desperate. They are
not ladies and gentlemen looking for a
religion, they are utterly desperate
men and women in search of redemption
without what AA gives, death stares
them in the face. With what AA gives
them, there is life and hope. There
are not a dozen ways, there are not
two ways, there is one way; and they
find it, or perish. AA's each and all
have a definite, desperate need. They
have the need, and they are ready to
tell somebody what it is if they see
the least chance that it can be met.Is
there anything as definite for you or
me, who may happen not to be
alcoholics? If there k, I am sure that
it lies in the realm of our conscious
withholding of the truth about
ourselves from God and from one
another, by pretending that we are
already good Christians. Let me here
quote a member of AA who has written a
most amazing book: his name is Jerome
Ellison, and the book is Report to
the Creator. In this (p .210) he
says, The relief of being
accepted can never be known by one who
never thought himself unaccepted. I
hear of 'good Christian men and women'
belonging to 'fine old church
families.' There were no good
Christians in the first church, only
sinners. Peter never let himself or
his hearers forget his betrayal in the
hour the cock crew. James, stung by
the memory of his years of stubborn
resistance, warned the church members:
'Confess your faults to one another.'
That was before there were fine old
church families. Today, the last place
where one can be candid about one's
faults is in church. In a bar, yes; in
a church, no. I know; I've tried both
places. Let that sting you and
me just as it should, and make us
miserable with our church Pharisaism
till we see it is just as definite and
just as hideous as anybody's
drunkenness can ever be, and a great
deal more really dangerous.
2. Redeemed in Life-Changing
Fellowship
The second thing the Church needs to
learn from AA is that men are redeemed
in a life changing fellowship. AA does
not expect to let anybody who comes in
stay as he is. They know he is in need
and must have help. They live for
nothing else but to extend and keep
extending that help. Like the Church,
they did not begin in glorious Gothic
structures, but in houses or caves in
the earth, wherever they could get a
foot-hold, meet people, and gather. It
never occurs to an AA that it is
enough for him to sit down and polish
his spiritual nails all by himself, or
dust off his soul all by himself, or
spend a couple of minutes praying each
day all by himself. His soul gets kept
in order by trying to help other
people get their souls in order with
the help of God. At once a new person
takes his place in this redeeming,
life-changing fellowship. He may be
changed today, and out working
tomorrow - no long, senseless delays
about giving away what he has got.
He's ready to give the little he has
the moment it comes to him. The
fellowship that redeemed him will
wither and die unless he and others
like him get in and keep that
fellowship moving and growing by
reaching others. Recently I heard an
AA say that he could stay away from
his Veteran's meeting, his Legion, or
his Church, and nobody would notice
it. But if he stayed away from his AA
meeting, his telephone would begin to
ring the next day."A
life-changing fellowship" sounds
like a description of the Church. It
is of the ideal Church. But the
actual? Not one in a hundred is like
this. The laymen say this is the
minister's job, and the ministers say
it is the evangelist's job, and
everybody finds a rationalized excuse
for not doing what every Christian
ought to be doing, i.e. bringing other
people into the redeeming,
life-changing fellowship.
3. Definite Personal Dealing with
People
The third thing the Church needs to
learn from AA is the necessity for
definite personal dealing with people.
AA's know all the stock excuses -
they've used them themselves and heard
them a hundred times. All the blame
put on someone else - my temperament
is different - I've tried it and it
doesn't work for me - I'm not really
so bad, I just slip a little
sometimes. They've heard them all, and
know them for the rationalized pack of
lies they are. They constitute, taken
together, the Gospel of Hell and
Failure. I've heard them laboring with
one another, now patient as a mother,
now savage as a prizefighter, now
careful in explanation, now pounding
in a heavy personal challenge, but
always knowing the desperate need and
the sure answer.Are we in the
Church like that? Have you ever been
drastically dealt with by anybody?
Have you ever dared to be drastic in
love with anybody? We are so official,
so polite, so ready to accept
ourselves and each other at face
value. I went for years before ever I
met a man that dared get at my real
needs, create a situation in which I
could be honest with him, and hold me
to a specific Christian commitment and
decision. One can find kindness and
even good advice in the Church. That
is not all men need. They need to be
helped to face themselves as they
really are. The AA people see
themselves just as they are. I think
many of us in the Church see ourselves
as we should like to appear to others,
not as we are before God. We need
drastic personal dealing and
challenge. Who is ready and trained to
give it to us? How many of us have
ever taken a "fearless moral
inventory" of ourselves, and
dared make the depth of our need known
to any other human being? This gets at
the pride which is the hindrance and
sticking-point for so many of us, and
which, for most of us in the Church,
has never even been recognized, let
alone faced or dealt with.
4. Necessity for a Real Change of
Heart
The fourth thing the Church needs to
learn from AA is the necessity for a
real change of heart, a true
conversion. As we come Sunday after
Sunday, year after year, we are
supposed to be in a process of
transformation. Are we? The AA's are.
At each meeting there are people
seeking and in conscious need.
Everybody is pulling for the people
who speak, and looking for more
insight and help. They are pushed by
their need. They are pulled by the
inspiration of others who are growing.
They are a society of the "before
and after," with a clear line
between the old life and the new. This
is not the difference between
sinfulness and perfection, but it is
the difference between accepted
wrongdoing and the genuine beginning
of a new way of life.How about us?
Again, I quote Jerome Ellison, in his
report to God (p .205): "...I
began to see that many of the
parishioners did not really want to
find You, because finding You would
change them from their habitual ways,
and they did not want to endure the
pain of change... For our
churchman-like crimes of bland,
impenetrable pose, I offer
shame..." I suppose that the
sheer visibility of the alcoholic
problem creates a kind of enforced
honesty; but surely if we are exposed
again and again to God, to Christ, to
the Cross, there - should be a
breaking down of our pride and
unwillingness to change. We should
know by now that this unwillingness,
multiplied by thousands and tens of
thousands, is what is the matter with
the Church, and what keeps it from
being what God means it to be on
earth. The change must begin
somewhere. We know it ought to begin
in us. One of the greatest things
the Church should learn from AA is the
need people have for an exposure to
living Christian experience. In
thousands of places, alcoholics (and
others) can go and hear recovered
alcoholics speak about their
experiences and watch the process of
new life and outlook take place before
their eyes. There you have it, the
need and the answer to the need, right
before your eyes. They say that their
public relations are based, not on
promotion, but on attraction. This
attraction begins when you see people
with problems like your own, hear them
speaking freely of the answers they
are finding, and realize that such
honesty and such change is exactly
what you need yourself. No ordinary
service of worship in the Church can
possibly do this. We need to
supplement what we do now by the
establishment of informal companies
where people who are spiritually
seeking can see how faith takes hold
in other lives, how the
characteristically Christian
experience comes to them. Some
churches are doing this, but not
nearly enough of them. One I know
where on Sunday evenings laymen and
women speak simply about what has
happened to them spiritually; it is
drawing many more by attraction. This
needs to be multiplied by the tens of
thousands, and the Church itself
awakened. As I looked out over that
crowd of five thousand in Kiel
Auditorium in St. Louis, I said to
myself, "Would that the Church
were like this - ordinary men and
women with great need who have found a
great Answer, and do not hesitate to
make it known wherever they can - a
trained army of enthusiastic, humble,
human workers whose efforts make life
a different thing for other
people!" Let us ask God to
forgive our blindness and laziness and
complacency, and through these re-made
people to learn our need for honesty,
for conversion, for fellowship and for
honest witness!
|